Click on the black arrow to open the chat in a new window.
If we're not online, please email us at urilibrarian@gmail.com. Please allow 1-2 business days for a response.
What is copyright?
How does copyright work?
What is protected by copyright?
What is not protected by copyright?
Along these lines, we can see that a cookbook could be copyrighted, because it is a unique compilation, but the recipes in it could not, as they consist of lists of ingredients and procedures.
How is copyright enforced?
The Internet offers an unprecedented opportunity for people to (illegally) share copyrighted “intellectual property.” With the Internet, copyright holders face the same issues in defending their copyrights that they do with photocopiers, tape recorders, VCR’s, and CD burners, but on a much larger scale. There is a difference in magnitude between copying a CD for a friend and posting an MP3 on the Web for anyone to download.
With a growing amount of information (text, music, video) in digitized form, we are already seeing a shift from the concept of “ownership” to the concept of “access.” Copyright holders (publishers, record companies, etc.) are experimenting with charging information users “per-use” or for a specific time period instead of for indefinite rights to the information.
For example, instead of a buying a CD, in the future you might pay each time you listen to a particular song. Think “pay-per-view” movies applied to music. In libraries, this is already happening: instead of a library buying a book or database in printed or electronic form and sharing it with library users for years to come, libraries are paying annual subscriptions to access specific information. If they stop paying, all access to the information, even the older information, is lost. Will this ultimately limit access to information? Will it increase the gap between “information have’s and have-not’s”?
If it is indeed true that copyright once performed the function of increasing the output of creative works by ensuring the author exclusive rights to profit from the work, is this still the case? Given the huge amount of their own creative work and useful information that individuals make available for free on the Internet (for example freeware, MP3’s that haven’t been released by a record company, creative and scholarly writing), are copyright laws really necessary after all to provide an incentive for people to create and share their work? Do copyright laws, especially revisions of the copyright laws that apply to digital information, limit the sharing of information to the point of stifling creativity? Does the very concept of “intellectual property” and the limits on access to information that it implies now hold back the further development of human society?
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.